Kerala Police registered a case against Shimjitha Musthafa for abetment to suicide .

The digital landscape in Kerala has recently been shaken by a viral incident that perfectly encapsulates the dangerous intersection of social media influence and real-world consequences. This "videomalayali girl" controversy, centered on content creator , has ignited a nationwide discussion on the ethics of "social media trials" and the devastating impact of viral character assassination. The Viral Video and the Immediate Backlash

The power of the viral narrative took a tragic turn on , when Deepak was found dead by suicide in his home in Kozhikode. His family reported that the 42-year-old textile firm employee was deeply distressed by the public humiliation and character assassination he faced online.

In a second video, Musthafa doubled down on her claims, asserting that the act was "neither an accident nor a misunderstanding" and that she filmed him because she saw another girl nearby who also looked uncomfortable. Tragic Consequences and the Shift in Narrative

Deepak’s family and friends have maintained his innocence, describing him as a decent person who had never been involved in any controversy. They alleged that the influencer used the video as a tool for "online publicity" and to gain followers. Legal Repercussions and Social Media Impact

The Kerala State Human Rights Commission intervened, ordering a formal investigation into the circumstances leading to the man's death. Wider Discussion: The "Digital Mob" Mentality

Netizens immediately shared the clip, leading to massive online abuse and trolling directed at Deepak.

The incident has moved from the screen to the courtroom, sparking a legal precedent for how viral accusations are handled:

Kerala Man Ends Life After Viral Video Accuses Him ... - NDTV

As of May 2026, the investigation continues to draw attention to the need for balanced social media use and the critical importance of due process over viral vigilantism.